Domestic vs Imported Bearings: Is There a Real Gap? (I)
Domestic vs Imported Bearings: Is There a Real Gap? (I)
2026-08-06
Are domestic bearings truly inferior to imported bearings? With more than 20 years of experience running a bearing factory, I can tell you the reality is far more complicated than you think.
Why is there seemingly no solution for domestic general-purpose bearings? Technology is not the issue. We have successfully manufactured main bearings for national heavy equipment, so technical capability has long ceased to be an obstacle. Neither is management to blame. Staff at every link follow regulations and perform their duties properly, and there is no widespread dereliction of duty. We are trapped in a systemic deadlock: the entire industrial chain has formed a closed-loop logic of self-preservation. Every department only makes risk-free decisions for its own interests, resulting in local optimization yet a total collapse of overall benefits.
Let us analyze the dilemma of bearing manufacturers first. High-end bearings made from electroslag remelting steel with P4/P5 precision require customized bulk orders with high minimum order quantities, and no party will cover the inventory risks brought by individual high-end batch production. For scattered orders and urgent spot orders, manufacturers adopt ordinary refined steel, simplified heat treatment and basic P0 precision; low-spec products sold in large volumes at thin profit margins guarantee steady cash flow. High-end customized orders are scarce and high-risk, driving many manufacturers to voluntarily launch tiered product supply strategies.
From the perspective of motor manufacturers, the lowest-bid bidding system and audit assessment restrict procurement choices. Auditors only compare prices for products with identical models and appearance parameters, and do not recognize implicit quality premiums. Procurement managers who select more expensive bearings will face audit accountability, leaving them no choice but to pick the cheapest qualified suppliers.
Leading foreign brands such as SKF and Schaeffler offer no low-end budget product lines, and uniformly enforce strict standards for raw materials, machining and heat treatment across all specifications. Their decades-long brand barriers, paired with global mass production, greatly amortize high-end manufacturing costs, eliminating the need to cut corners to secure orders. They never adopt a dual-quality strategy with premium batches and budget batches.
The end result is the well-known phenomenon of bad money driving out good money. Domestic general-purpose bearings have long been labeled as short-lived and unstable. Imported brands become the default choice for high-reliability working conditions. Although breakthroughs have been achieved in high-end special bearing technologies, domestic standard general bearings keep losing mainstream market share.
In the next article, we will discuss how to break the deadlock of poor public reputation surrounding domestic general-purpose bearings.
Domestic vs Imported Bearings: Is There a Real Gap? (I)
Domestic vs Imported Bearings: Is There a Real Gap? (I)
Are domestic bearings truly inferior to imported bearings? With more than 20 years of experience running a bearing factory, I can tell you the reality is far more complicated than you think.
Why is there seemingly no solution for domestic general-purpose bearings? Technology is not the issue. We have successfully manufactured main bearings for national heavy equipment, so technical capability has long ceased to be an obstacle. Neither is management to blame. Staff at every link follow regulations and perform their duties properly, and there is no widespread dereliction of duty. We are trapped in a systemic deadlock: the entire industrial chain has formed a closed-loop logic of self-preservation. Every department only makes risk-free decisions for its own interests, resulting in local optimization yet a total collapse of overall benefits.
Let us analyze the dilemma of bearing manufacturers first. High-end bearings made from electroslag remelting steel with P4/P5 precision require customized bulk orders with high minimum order quantities, and no party will cover the inventory risks brought by individual high-end batch production. For scattered orders and urgent spot orders, manufacturers adopt ordinary refined steel, simplified heat treatment and basic P0 precision; low-spec products sold in large volumes at thin profit margins guarantee steady cash flow. High-end customized orders are scarce and high-risk, driving many manufacturers to voluntarily launch tiered product supply strategies.
From the perspective of motor manufacturers, the lowest-bid bidding system and audit assessment restrict procurement choices. Auditors only compare prices for products with identical models and appearance parameters, and do not recognize implicit quality premiums. Procurement managers who select more expensive bearings will face audit accountability, leaving them no choice but to pick the cheapest qualified suppliers.
Leading foreign brands such as SKF and Schaeffler offer no low-end budget product lines, and uniformly enforce strict standards for raw materials, machining and heat treatment across all specifications. Their decades-long brand barriers, paired with global mass production, greatly amortize high-end manufacturing costs, eliminating the need to cut corners to secure orders. They never adopt a dual-quality strategy with premium batches and budget batches.
The end result is the well-known phenomenon of bad money driving out good money. Domestic general-purpose bearings have long been labeled as short-lived and unstable. Imported brands become the default choice for high-reliability working conditions. Although breakthroughs have been achieved in high-end special bearing technologies, domestic standard general bearings keep losing mainstream market share.
In the next article, we will discuss how to break the deadlock of poor public reputation surrounding domestic general-purpose bearings.